Should Kim Jong Ill launch a missile at Hawaii rather or not it is a test, must be considered an act of war against the United States. I would go so far as to say that the threat alone is reason enough for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea in our own defense! President Obama is not even answering the challenge in public. Kim Jong Ill sees weakness in our President and is testing him. In the event of a launch by that despotic little dictator, President Obama must ask Congress for a declaration of war, if he does nothing, then Congress must declare war with out the Presidents request. If both do nothing, then the members of Congress and the President will have violated their oaths of office and will be derelict in one of their primary Duties to the American people. If it should become necessary, we the American people must demand congress declare war against North Korea, We must bring Kim Jung Ill to his Knees by leveling every city in his country. This sick nut is threatening us directly, and if the President Obama does nothing, then he must be removed from office or step down. If he cannot understand what North Korea is up to, and the appropriate way to handle this situation, he is not fit to run an ice cream truck much less the U. S. A.

     The slave owners of old and the employers of illegals today are much the same. Employers today make the same dire Prophesies sopprting their deeds as the  slave owners of old  did.  Employers of  illegal workers and those that support illegal immigration say that with out it our economy would collapse. The south  made the same argument in support of slavery. They said ”cotton rice and tobacco would become unprofitable if slavery ended abruptly and that chaos would ensue”. Advocates of Illegal immigration and employers say that it is morally right to employ these people because they are better off working here illegally than working in their own country. Slave owners and southern Politicians said “that Slavery brought Christianity to the heathen from across the ocean”. Slavery was, according to this argument, a good thing for the enslaved. John C. Calhoun said, “Never before has the black race of Central Africa, from the dawn of history to the present day, attained a condition so civilized and so improved, not only physically, but morally and intellectually.” they also said “ by comparison with the poor of Europe and the workers in the Northern states, that slaves were better cared for. They said that “their owners would protect and assist them when they were sick and aged, unlike those who, once fired from their work, were left to fend helplessly for themselves”. The arguments made for the Slavery in the south and for illegal migrant workers are all the same, we have been here before, and we have not learned from history.

          Once again we in the United States are faced with slavery, This time our Federal Government is on the side of the slave owners. It has done every thing it can to facilitate it. The slaves this time are more willing to come, but they are disadvantaged just the same.  At first the U.S. Government supported the slavery in the south but eventually under pressure changed its tune. It remains to be seen what our first black president will do about this newer form of slavery.  eventually though the Fedreal Government will have to change its tune for the survival of the Nation. 

Note: the quotes in this article are taken from Lesson 27f  The Southern Argument for Slavery (ushistory.org)

We all know that the California Supreme Court usurped the will of the people of the state of California when they voted to declare the gay marriage ban, (voted in to law by the people) unconstitutional. The court sited the equal protections clause of the California State Constitution.

The fact is marriage is not a right specified in any constitution; therefore marriage bans can be made law. The equal protections clause doesn’t apply to the gay marriage ban in California. To understand why it doesn’t apply, we must look at the Constitutions of the state of California and the U. S. Constitution, in context, and how each relates to the other.

California Sate Constitution article 1 section 7 states:

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Equal Protection
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

SEC. 7. (a) A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or
property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the
laws; provided, that nothing contained herein or elsewhere in this
Constitution imposes upon the State of California or any public
entity, board, or official any obligations or responsibilities which
exceed those imposed by the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th
Amendment to the United States Constitution with respect to the use
of pupil school assignment or pupil transportation. In enforcing
this subdivision or any other provision of this Constitution, no
court of this State may impose upon the State of California or any
public entity, board, or official any obligation or responsibility
with respect to the use of pupil school assignment or pupil
transportation, (1) except to remedy a specific violation by such
party that would also constitute a violation of the Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and
(2) unless a federal court would be permitted under federal
decisional law to impose that obligation or responsibility upon such
party to remedy the specific violation of the Equal Protection Clause
of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Except as may be precluded by the Constitution of the United
States, every existing judgment, decree, writ, or other order of a
court of this State, whenever rendered, which includes provisions
regarding pupil school assignment or pupil transportation, or which
requires a plan including any such provisions shall, upon application
to a court having jurisdiction by any interested person, be modified
to conform to the provisions of this subdivision as amended, as
applied to the facts which exist at the time of such modification.
In all actions or proceedings arising under or seeking application
of the amendments to this subdivision proposed by the Legislature at
its 1979-80 Regular Session, all courts, wherein such actions or
proceedings are or may hereafter be pending, shall give such actions
or proceedings first precedence over all other civil actions therein.

Nothing herein shall prohibit the governing board of a school
district from voluntarily continuing or commencing a school
integration plan after the effective date of this subdivision as
amended.
In amending this subdivision, the Legislature and people of the
State of California find and declare that this amendment is necessary
to serve compelling public interests, including those of making the
most effective use of the limited financial resources now and
prospectively available to support public education, maximizing the
educational opportunities and protecting the health and safety of all
public school pupils, enhancing the ability of parents to
participate in the educational process, preserving harmony and
tranquility in this State and its public schools, preventing the
waste of scarce fuel resources, and protecting the environment.
(b) A citizen or class of citizens may not be granted privileges
or immunities not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Privileges or immunities granted by the Legislature may be altered or
revoked.

United States constitution amendment 13, 14, 15 state:

Amendment XIII
Passed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.
Note: A portion of Article IV, section 2, of the Constitution was superseded by the 13th amendment.
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States , or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Amendment XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,* and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
the Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
*Changed by section 1 of the 26th amendment.
Amendment XV
Passed by Congress February 26, 1869. Ratified February 3, 1870.
Section 1.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude –
Section 2.
The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

In context it’s clear to me, the equal protections clause of the California State Constitution was intended to ensure that the states laws passed by Ballot measure or by the state legislature were to apply and be enforced equally on all citizens of the state. So a law banning gay marriage applies to all citizens and is to be enforced equally to all citizens.
My point is further amplified by the 14th amendment to the U. S. Constitution. The intent of the 14th amendment can be best understood in context with the 13th and 15th Amendments. In a nut shell, the 13th amendment freed the slaves, the 14th amendment declared all peoples born or naturalized including the former slaves within the United States, Citizens of the whole United States, and a Citizens of the State in witch they reside. As citizens under the 14th amendment the slaves became equal citizens to the rest of the population of the United States, thus they were to be equally protected under the law. Remember Slaves were considered property under the law prior. The 15th amendment gave the slaves the right to vote. All three amendments were for the sole purpose of ending slavery and the disposition and treatment of former slaves. So the California Supreme Court was wrong in its application of the equal protections clause. I believe the California Supreme Court grasped at any thing they could to support gay marriage and made up an argument they believed the MSM would buy,

Both the U. S. Constitution and the California State constitution state the same thing in their respective equal protections clauses, California’s clause has further subdivisions to allow exceptions to the clause with respect to bussing students to other schools out side their districts. California’s constitution is subordinate to the U.S. Constitution.

     O. J. has been convicted on all counts, and the race racketeers Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are not crying injustice or even a tear for him. Some may say: “he is guilty, Why should they care?” Answer: They did not care that the so called “Jena 6″ were guilty of beating another teen within inches of his life. They also did not care that Crystal Gail Mangum falsely accused the Duke Lacrosse team of rape. Al Sharpton knew and did not care that Tawana Brawley’s Case was a hoax! So Why not take up  Simpsons case? Answer: There is no money in it for them.

      I do not know if O. J. was responsible for killing his wife. As an American I beleive as our founding fathers did; A man is innocent until proven guilty. I lived in LA When O. J. Was Arrested for murder. The LA DA and LAPD had a reputation for going easy on the Celebs. Both desperately needed to prove otherwise. O. J. Was the perfect opportunity. They were so desperate that Detective Mark Ferman planted a glove as evidence and was caught. the Jurors found him not guilty. This out come did not fit the agenda of either Al or Jesse, because his case proved that the Justice system isn’t racist. O. J. having been rich allowed him to buy the best lawyers around and beat the charges. No racism equals no money for Al and Jesse.  Simpson’s current conviction, I believe is a Justice served conviction on his murder case, and not an armed robbery and kidnapping case, we will have to see during the appeal. I believe that O.J. had no other choice but to do what he did if in fact the memorabilia was stolen from him. Why do I say that? Answer:  No cop or DA would take any complaint he made against the dealers seriously, and would not want to be seen on his side in the media. What else is he to do?  Once again Al and Jesse Don’t want to go near O. J. because there is not sympathy for him in the media, or in the black community. Again, no racism, no media sympathy equals no money for Al and Jesse.

       Liberals are still to this day livid that President George W. Bush beat Al Gore in 2000. Al knew he lost and tried to steal the office via the courts. Even the liberal Supreme Court would not Allow it. The day the Supreme Court ruled in President Bushes favor was a great day in American history! That day America got a lesson in the responsibility that comes along with rights! We have the right to vote and the responsibility to get a fresh ballot punch card if we make mistakes. we have a right to vote and a responsibility to get help punching the “chad” if needed. We have a right to vote and a responsibility to follow the simple laws and rules at the polling place. If we forgo the responsibilities we must live with the consequences. Al gore sued to abdicate our responsibility for the outcome in the 2000 election. Thank all mighty God he lost.

Navy News (navy.mil) USS George Washington Investigation Complete, Senior Leadership Relieved

       I don’t know about anyone else, but I am having trouble the Navy’s explanation of the fire on board the USS George Washington. To qualify my self to comment, let me say that I am a former navy sailor. I was stationed on a Ship though not an aircraft carrier for 3 1/2 years of my total navel experience of 8 years. I am a life long non-smoker. I will always support my Navy and sailors, but I’m not buying the Navy’s story.

       According to the Navy News artical above the fire “most likely” was started by a cigarette. “most likely” means they don’t really know how the fire started. the article says that the mystery smoker lit up a smoke in an “unmanned Auxiliary Boiler Exhaust and Supply space”. First question I have is: Whats a boiler room doing on a CVN? Certainly not propulsion, most navy ships no longer have “boiler rooms” per Se. Most ships use gas turbine engines. there are some navy owned supply ships that may still have boilers used for propulsion, but there are no Air Craft Carriers using boilers for propulsion. The only thing CVN would use a “boiler” for is to provide hot water to the crew and evaporate salt water to make fresh water. On the ship I was stationed on the boilers for water and evaporators were located in the ships main engineering spaces (engine rooms) for you non sailor types. That aside. The real key words that stand out to me and raises what is called in the navy “red flags” or as we enlisted sailors called them “Bull S#%&@ Flags” are “unmanned, Exhaust and Supply Space”. Wile in the Navy I had the glorious honor of having to paint one of these “exhaust spaces”accessed in the chilled water air handler room for witch my radio division was responsible. the access hatch for the room was small with multiple levers to seal the hatch, it opened inward so that a sailor would not be hit by an outward swinging door pushed by air pressure while the fan is running. As for the designation of supply space, well that means that the supply department was responsible for the space because it was located or accessed from a space used by the supply department, which most likely was the room that housed the compressors and or pumps for the ships freezers and or refrigeration storage rooms. In my case my exhaust space could be called the “Exhaust and Radio space” by the author of the article. The oil stored in the compressor room was in drums sealed as shown by an Associated Press photo on foxnews.com. The inference of improper storage simply means the oil drums were not stored in the “Hazmat locker” with other flammable and “hazardous materials”, those oil drums may have had to be there for a reason unknown to the investigators. My exhaust room it self was a small room with a vent tube extending from the floor but not all the way to the ceiling. one wall of the room was the exterior wall of the superstructure with a oval shaped opening with nothing more than a metal grid covering it. In the tube farther below there was a very loud fan blowing air up the tube and out of the exterior wall opening. this was probably the same for USS George Washington though the vent and room may have been bigger. The ship was underway when the fire started so the exhaust fan was running. the air rushes so fast in that room that you cannot light a match or lighter in it, a lit cigarette would flare up and burn the smoker, so they should have found a dead charred smoker or at least a sailor with burns on his or her face.  A lit cigarette would also have been sucked out of the smokers mouth and the little fire ball blown out of the ship. It is very unlikely therefore that a smoker  in the exhaust room started the fire. If one could smoke in that room they would have desposed of the but out side the ship via the opening in the exterior wall. As for the liquid oil in the adjacent room, that being the coolant compressor room, it was in drums and sealed, a cigarette could not have lit those. No sailor would dispose their but in and open oil dumb.

        Here is a better “smoker” scenario. An engineer lights a smoke the “boiler room”, walks next to or under the exhaust vent, the old Marlboro is disloged from his/her mouth, sucked up the vent burning hotter because of the air flow, hits the cealing of the ”unmanned Exhaust and Supply room, recherch’es with the whipping air towards the wall of the room opposite the exterior wall opening, lodges between or behind boxes improperly stored by supply personell in the windy room, provided there were box there. The rushing air blowing on the cigarette quickly ignites the boxes they go up in flames. Sounding and Security watch personell walks down the passage nearby unaware of the fire at this point, because smoke is being exhausted out side the ship by the vent fan. The aft of the ship being the rear of the ship no one else notices the smoke right way either. As the fire continues the paint and the insulation on the interior walls of the Exhaust room starts to burn engulfing the whole room in flames, the cable runs that should not have been running trough that room in the first place, heat up and burn, as they burn the air starts to forcefully rush its way through the holes made in the walls dividing the the spaces for the cables, one room being the Compressor room where the Oil drumbs had been stored, the paint and insulation of that room started to burn also. no one walking down the passageway would not have smelled smoke at this point because not may people would walk by the compressor room, but if they did the water tight door to the room would prevent smoke from getting in the passage way. They would however have noticed the heat radiating from room on the passage wall. As the compressor room burned and became engulfed in flames the drums heated up and exploded, now they had an oil fire on there hand spreading quickly. 

       That’s at least more reasonable. The Navy may not be able to tell the truth because the real cause of the fire may be classified. In my experience Ship casualties were classified. This Navy P. C. C.M.A (Politically Correct, Cover My A**) explanation will cause the senate to waste time investigating the Navy’s smoking policy and Hazmat storage Policy . It will also cause the P. C. Navy leadership to waste time having smoking safety briefings and smoking safety stand downs.  Come on Navy you can do better than that!

Time For the U.S.A. to get out of the U.N.

Originally published July 11, 2008

(Houston Chronicle) Texas still plans to execute killer despite U.N. order.

      Good for you Houston! The criminal U.N. no longer belongs on U.S. soil. Its time For the USA to get out of the U.N.,demolish the buildings and turn it into the worlds largest public toilet.  the U.N. is nothing more than a den of vipers and hyenas. They stole millions from the U.S taxpayer via the oil for food scandal. They have taken the side of terrorists, terror states. they caused the deaths of innocents by taking the wrong side in Cosivo, doing nothing in Darfur, and their wars have been failures ending in truces that split countries in half IE Korea. Now they dare to steal our sovereignty over an Illegal Immigrant Murderer in the world Court. Our nation is not a U.N. subject to be spat upon. The U.N. is useless, corrupted, and weak. time to put an end to it.